Scientific Management - 3842 Words

Federic Taylor s Scientific Management reflects an approach to managing that is no longer appropriate for today’s managers . Critically evaluate this statement with particular reference to an example from workspace with which you are familiar. Guidance: Many management textbooks claim that Taylor s ideas are no longer appropriate, but consider whether an organization can operate without clear rules, hierarchy and division of labor. Many large and successful organizations, such as McDonalds hamburger chain or call centers, appear to use a modern version of scientific management. It would also be a good idea to consider whether these sort of generalizations can be applied in a global manner, or whether they tend to reflect the†¦show more content†¦[3] Using these three reasons Taylor developed the four principles of the scientific management [4]: †¢ Develop a science for each element of a man’s work and replace the â€Å"rule-of-thumb† method. †¢ Scientifically select, train and develop workers instead of allowing them to choose their own tasks, decide the best way to complete the job and carry out their own training. †¢ Provide Detailed instruction and supervision of each worker in the performance of that worker s discrete task [5]. †¢ Split the work in the same proportions between the management and workers. Managers will use the scientific methods to plan and organize the work and workers will actually perform the tasks. The productivity under Taylor’s method dramatically increased and costs of the manufactured goods were reduced by 1/10 to 1/20 of the previous manufactured cost. These changes allowed more people to purchase the goods [6]. It looks like the scientific management theory was the perfect solutions to the problems in organizations in the 20th century. But is scientific management appropriate in a modern world? The next section will look at pros and cons of this theory and the use of scientific management in today’s organizations. The appropriateness of Scientific Management for today’s managers Taylor’s functions of management highlighted the importance of carefully practicingShow MoreRelatedThe Theory Of Scientific Management1633 Words   |  7 PagesThe purpose of this essay is to research, analyse and assess the theory of scientific management, which was revolutionised by Frederick Winslow Taylor in 1887 (A.Huczynski, 2010) and to critically evaluate the benefits and pitfalls of his theory. This theory Taylor developed is known as Taylorism and has been used commonly in various structures of organisation. Comparisons shall be drawn to other theories and advancements of this theory, such as Fordism and Toyotism, which was extremely popular inRead MoreThe Principles Of Scientific Management3291 Words   |  14 PagesTHE PRINCIPLES OF SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT (TAYLORISM) STUDENT NAME : SOWMITH VATSAVAI ROLL NO : 120908246 BRANCH : INDUSTRIAL AND PRODUCTION ENGG. E-MAIL ID : SOWMITH.V@GMAIL.COM CONTACT NO : 09740459479 INDEX Sl.no Contents Page No. 1 Fundamentals 2 2 Introduction 5 3 Experimentation 6 4 Principles 9 5 Conclusion 15 6 References 16 â€Æ' 1.Fundamentals of Scientific Management 1.1 Introduction Read MoreScientific Management2246 Words   |  9 PagesSCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT AND CONTRIBUTION TO ECONOMY Scientific management is a theory of management that analysis and synthesizes workflows, with the objective of improving labour productivity. The core ideas of the theory were developed by Frederick Winslow Taylor in the 1880s and 1890s, and were first published in his monographs, Shop Management (1905) and The Principles of Scientific Management (1911). He began trying to discover a way for workers to increase their efficiency when he was the forepersonRead MoreScientific Management2016 Words   |  9 PagesScientific management (also called Taylorism, the Taylor system, or the Classical Perspective) is a theory of management that analyzes and synthesizes workflow processes, improving labor productivity. The core ideas of the theory were developed by Frederick Winslow Taylor in the 1880s and 1890s, and were first published in his monographs, Shop Management (1905) and The Principles of Scientific Management (1911).[1] Taylor believed that decisions based upon tradition and rules of thumb should be replacedRead MoreThe Principles Of Scientific Management1337 Words   |  6 Pagescentury ago, Frederick Winslow Taylor’s renowned work The Principles of Scientific Management set forth a theory that to this day is subjected to a similar degree of critique and debate to that in the early 20th century. While Taylor’s ideas were evidently influenced by the works of earlier researchers, it is he who is credited as the â€Å"father† of the scientific management movement (Jeacle, 2004, p. 1164). As such, scientific management itself is synonymous with Taylor to the extent that it is commonlyRead MoreThe Advantages Of Scientific Management Essay1594 Words   |  7 PagesIn the early 20th Century, Frederick Winslow Taylor revolutionised work in factories through the development of his new form of management; Scientific management. It is a method of worker management that involves scientifically finding the best way to divide labour and to do each ind ividual job as easily as possible, and finding the best person for that job. It is done through removing the control of production from the workers and putting it in the hands of the managers, who oversee the processRead MorePrinciples of Scientific Management1149 Words   |  5 PagesScientific Management is a theory of management that analyzed and synthesized workflows. Its main objective was improving economic efficiency, especially labor productivity. It was one of the earliest attempts to apply science to the engineering of processes and to management. Its development began with Frederick Winslow Taylor in the 1880s and 1890s within the manufacturing industries. Taylor was an American mechanical engineer and a management consultant in his later years. He is often calledRead MoreThe Scientific Management of Taylor1493 Words   |  6 PagesIntroduction Taylor used valuable knowledge into work practice, as the appearance of scientific management, the productivity of all the developed countries increased nearly 50 times (Zuo, 2007). In the meanwhile, whether the scientific management is suitable for modern age has sparked much debate. Some people assert that scientific have some limitations. Therefore, this essay tends to analyze several parts of scientific management, some problems caused by it and whether it is suitable to the modern enterprisesRead MoreThe Principles Of Scientific Management2994 Words   |  12 PagesIntroduction Good management can be defined as the optimal use of available resources to increase an organisation s efficiency and effectiveness in meeting its objectives (Garg, 2013). Scientific management has been the dominant model for many years, but its usefulness for meeting modern organisational challenges may be limited. This paper examines the principles of scientific management, the degree to which it is applied in contemporary organisations, its utility for addressing modern challengesRead MoreThe Emergence Of Scientific Management1300 Words   |  6 PagesThe emergence of scientific management Frederick W. Taylor is called the father of scientific management who is world famous through his book named â€Å"The Principles of Scientific Management†. â€Å"The Principles of Scientific Management† was first published in the early 20th century. Through his work, Frederick W. Taylor described that the process of scientific management can increase total worker organizational efficiency. The theory of scientific management was not invented by one day. It took many

William Shakespeare s Much Ado About Nothing - 1608 Words

In Shakespeare s play, Much Ado about Nothing, many contrasting views on the subject of love are dramatised in the relationships presented, particularly those of Benedick and Beatrice, and Claudio and Hero. These views help to shape the play into a comedy, due to the severe differences. Benedick s slightly misogynistic views of love at the start of the play contrast heavily with his views by the end, as they change so drastically. He claims, in Act 1 Scene 1, that he is loved by all ladies, yet he loves none, suggesting that he is quite frivolous in terms of loving, further supported by his claims of being a professional tyrant to their sex. Women love him nevertheless, but he does not reciprocate the feelings, as he deems women†¦show more content†¦Benedick states that her love must be requited and he will be horribly in love with her. This sudden change contrasts in his earlier, relationship with Beatrice in Act 2 Scene 1, where he ridicules and mocks her harshly, showing no signs of affection. His speech also contrasts with his earlier views on marriage, as he states that he did not think I would live till I was married, hinting at the fact that his views are now swaying. In Act 5 Scene 4, Benedick asks the friar to aid in his marriage confession, only t o be met with mockery from Claudio, who states they will tip his horns with gold, further relating to the cuckold motif and mocking the fact that he has changed his ways considerably. Beatrice, however, occupies a similar view on love as Benedick, as she was previously a misandrist. In Act 2 Scene 1, she states that she will die a virgin, evading her fate of leading apes into hell when she dies, an expression describing the fate of unmarried women, and instead will sit where the bachelors sit up in heaven. This leads into why she does not take interest in men, as she thinks that they have no substance to them apart from earth, comparing them to dirt to heighten her bitterness towards the sex. She also compares men to a piece of valiant dust and a clod of wayward marl, feeding the fact that she compares men to dirt and other earthly, useless substances. Despite Beatrice s apparent bitterness towards males in general, it could be interpreted

Sacred Hoops Free Essays

Sacred Hoops A. Bibliography: Jackson P. (1995). We will write a custom essay sample on Sacred Hoops or any similar topic only for you Order Now Sacred Hoops. 1st ed. New York, NY: Hyperion. B. Summary: Phil Jackson’s book, Sacred Hoops is him telling a story about his spiritual basketball journey to becoming one of the greatest NBA coaches of all time. It starts out with him coaching a season of the Bulls, then it flashes back to his high school life and him winning the state championship for Williston High School. After that he goes from an all American in college to a player at the New York Knicks, and the New Jersey Nets. After realizing playing pro ball wasn’t his thing, he turned to Zen Buddhism. From this Zen Buddhism he found himself, and found better ways to do things. He got asked to help coach the Nets as an assistant for a while. Phil also coached many minor league teams before becoming the assistant, and head coach of the Chicago Bulls where his career took off from there. C. Essay: The book: Sacred Hoops is about Phil Jackson and his story about the journey he took all the way from a little High School team, to coaching the Chicago Bulls where he won many National Championships. Sacred Hoops has many different ways that it relates to psychology. It relates to psychology when Phil kinda loses his way in life, and turns to Zen, How cognitive thinking can affect basketball playing, and how sports can deeply affect players emotions. Sacred Hoops relates to psychology in many ways, one of the first is that Phil kind of turned his life around with A religion called Zen Buddhism. Zen relates to psychology because it is a religion that is all about finding your inner self, and it helps you think in different, better ways. After Phil was kind of in a â€Å"drought† in his professional basketball career, he couldn’t think of anywhere else to go but to Zen. This religion taught him that his thoughts had many forms. This mean, say he had the ball he would have different thought like angered thoughts, thoughts to be a ball hog or not, or even thoughts to self praise him. These helped him all the time, and especially during coaching so he had different thoughts and could always handle a situation in the way. Zen also taught Phil that he needs to trust the moment. Like he says in the book â€Å"it’s not uncommon for basketball players, especially young ones, to expend a great deal of energy trying to be someone they’re not. † (Jackson, 51) this is saying players are trying to be someone better than who they are, and they get caught up in the game and just fail from there. He found out that if you just trust the moment, and trust yourself, you will do your best and succeed easier. This book also relates to psychology by showing how cognitive thinking can affect basketball playing. Basketball players can be greatly affected psychologically by all of their different surroundings, the things going on, and how games can affect them. Phil shows that many things affect how players may play, and media is one of the big factors. Media can get into a players head so easily and then they can play like absolute crap just because one thing can be blown out of proportion. Even coaches can be affected by their surroundings. In one of Phil’s games, there were 7 seconds left and they had the ball on a timeout. Phil was peer pressured into making one of the not so skilled shooters to take the shot, when their best shooter should of taken the shot, and they lost the game because of his decision. Some players just may play bad if they have an amazing player on the team like Michael Jordan. In most of the games, a lot of the players would think they wouldn’t have to do anything because Michael was just so good and basically won the games by himself. Well when it came to championship games, these players would make their team lose cause Jordan would get triple teamed and couldn’t score, so they then lose. Lastly players can also be hugely affected by a game win or loss. A win can boost someone up so much, and make them the happiest person alive, where as a loss can psychologically crush you, and tear you apart. Some losses can be worse than others, like game 7 of the finals when Phil lost cause he told his team to just relax a little and hold onto the ball. Because of those they lost, and he was so sad he never got over it, and kept reminiscing about it. Sports can also greatly affect and change people’s lives. Lastly this book shows how sports can greatly affect people’s lives. People can be affected for the greater, worse, or sports help them find abetted place. Some players careers can go so great, per say Michael Jordan, who is one of the greatest basketball players of all time. Basketball affected his life so positively because he was so good, and because of this his life was great. For some people sports can also tear their life apart, say they have a rough year or an injury, this could get to their head and mess up their career. So many athletes are affected by injuries and after they attempt a comeback might never play as good as they did before because they let it get to their heads. There are also people like Phil Jackson that playing professional basketball wasn’t made for him, so once he learned that he figured out that his thing was coaching, and he became one of the greatest coaches ever because of how much the sport of basketball impacted his life. These are some of the many different reasons that Sacred Hoops can relate to psychology, and a showing of some of his story to becoming one of the greatest coaches ever. This book is easily one of my favorite books, because it is about sports, and it teaches you so many different things. I would recommend this book to anyone and everyone even if you don’t like sports. How to cite Sacred Hoops, Essay examples Sacred Hoops Free Essays Phillip Douglas Jackson was born on September 17, 1945 in Deer Lodge, Montana. Jackson was known as the best NBA head coach of all time, leading the Chicago Bulls to six titles and the Los Angeles Lakers to three. Before Phil became known as a victorious head coach, he was an ordinary athlete. We will write a custom essay sample on Sacred Hoops or any similar topic only for you Order Now Phil Jackson played basketball, football, and baseball in high school and was recruited to North Dakota University to play basketball after graduation. While attending the college, Phil helped his team win third-and fourth-place finishes in the NCAA Division II championships. Jackson was known as the â€Å"Zen Master† to the game of basketball. In 1967, Phil Jackson was drafted in the second round by the New York Knicks, where he played as a favorite substitute for years. Phil grew older and realized he wanted to stay into the game by wasn’t going to play. Jackson began his coaching career in the lower leagues, receiving his big break in 1987 when he was hired as an assistant coach for the Chicago Bulls. Phil Jackson was promoted to head coach in 1989 and helmed the team until 1998. Despite the success, tension grew between Phil Jackson and the Bulls general manager Jerry Krause. After winning the title in 1999 he took a year off. Previously after 1999, Phil decided to take his coaching skills and intelligence to Los Angeles California, coaching the Lakers. Phil Jackson had endless success winning three championships straight with the Lakers, beating the New Jersey Nets, Indiana Pacers, and also the Philadelphia Seventy Sixers. Tension grew between two star players on the team; consequently, Jackson decided to leave. After the Lakers had a disappointing season 2004-2005, Phil was rehired as a head coach. 2007 Phil Jackson was known to be the highest paid coach in the NBA. Through all of his magnificent achievements, Phil Jackson managed to write a book called â€Å"Sacred Hoops. † In the book Sacred Hoops, Phil talks a lot about motivation, teamwork; moreover, learning how to keep calm in tough situations. Phil Jackson states, â€Å"Not only is there more to life than basketball, there’s a lot more to basketball than basketball. Jackson offers in the book an unusual mixture of new age advice and basketball knowledge, a sort of Zen and art of pro hoops. Jackson talks a lot about Zen metaphors, his message can be boiled down to two simple precepts: â€Å"The team is more important than one player or coach; furthermore, you have to live in the moment, on and off the court. † Phil explains succinctly how the Zen Buddhist concern with cleaning the mind of impurities to focus on immediate sensation can be put to use in a range of situations. Phil decided to write this book mainly for people who cannot work through difficult situations, â€Å"it’s almost a guideline to help you throughout your days† Jackson states. Phil Jackson was known to be one of the greatest coaches of all times, creating a dynasty with the Los Angeles Lakers. Phil Jackson was able to succeed by his meditated thoughts and ways to conquer the game. Jackson won eleven rings throughout his years of playing basketball and coaching the game of basketball. Phil will also be known as the â€Å"Zen Master† of basketball. How to cite Sacred Hoops, Papers

Progressive Movement In America Essay Example For Students

Progressive Movement In America Essay There was a great need for the progressives during the early 1900s. In 1900 Americas population was around 76 million, and one out of every seven of those 76 million was foreign. By 1915 there were 13 million more immigrants. If that wasnt enough of a drastic change in Americas culture, there was another huge change taking place. America was switching from small personal businesses, to the big business type of economy. Newer and bigger businesses meant different working conditions, different working classes as well as economic classes, and completely new jobs that hadnt even existed before. Often my parents and I disagree on current events, movies, music, etc. Sometimes I feel like they are both against change. If they see that things arent just as they were before, like during the time when they were my age, they see things as bad or wrong. On the other hand, I feel like change is necessary sometimes, and the times of the late 1800s and early 1900s were no exception. In defense of my parents, I dont always see the need for total changes. After all, as the old saying goes, if it isnt broke dont fix it. The progressive movement refused to stick with the status quo and instead welcomed change. However progressives also recognized that some things worked fairly well, like the general form of American government. So they felt a complete change was not necessary, but that some things could use a little work, and that is how progressives formed their basic goals. The progressive movement worked towards a more honest and active government at all levels so that the public interests might be better protected. During the late 19th century and early 1900s political machines held most of the political power at the state and local levels. These political machines were often corrupt and gained their power not by running good campaigns about relevant issues, but instead through providing favors for, and appealing to, those in need like immigrants. Most involved in the machines were more interested in making money than relevant political issues. The Federal government was itself fairly inactive, passing little or no important legislation and having usually passive election campaigns that addressed few issues. When the entire country is experiencing the effects of the dramatic changes I mentioned earlier, I feel disturbed that the government acted so passively. Progressives did Americans good by working for a stronger governments. Working conditions was also a point of focus for the progressive movement. With all the new jobs created by industrialization, new working conditions were also created. I suppose that some Americans worked in nicer places, got paid well, and also worked decent hours. However, it was too common that workers were overworked and underpaid. So progressives worked for better wages and more tolerable work conditions. Progressives also believed in sociological jurisprudence, or dealing with issues by viewing them from a sociological standpoint. When trying to decide what needed to be changed and fixed, the progressive movement was concerned with effects the changes would have on the entire society. Often when new standards or legislature was being set up, the composers were only concerned with how it would affect one specific group such as the wealthy upper class, the poor lower class, or immigrants. That system could hardly be effective during the late 1800s and early 1900s. Progressives realized that industrialization, immigration, and even expansion towards the West were changes that affected everyone, not just one particular group of people. The theory Social Darwinism was rejected by the progressive movement, and it is something I personally reject too. Social Darwinism was the belief that if a person failed, it was of some fault of their own and not of their conditions or surrounding environment. I just dont feel that way about personal failures. Preaks vs. administrators Essay Reasonably, I feel that if a person fails because they dont or wont try then their failure is a fault of themselves. However I also realize that if a person is laid off because a company wants to make cutbacks, or if there is an explosion at work and it injures workers so badly they can no longer work, I cannot see these as failures caused by their .